[نجمal]

المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة البروفيسور10 1. A normally neutral stimulus could cause a response. 2. It’s a stimulus that naturally elicits a response. 3. When the two stimuli were paired, something new happened. 4. As a result of conditioning, a warm feeling is associated with the product. قسم ان صاحبكم اكلها واربع تخررررب على اربع وفالك التوفيق ان شاء الله كلها عندي غلط وانا كنت حاسس اني راح اجيب a+ لكن الحمدلله

اخوي البروفسور اعتقد انه نموذج a صحيح وهل هذي الاجابات جميعها خاطئه

خذ عندك من الفراغات اللي جابها وتجدها في صفحة 44

Now Pavlov also observed that there were certain stimuli that did not elicit a response

2. We would say that learning was taking place when these stimuli were paired, that is when the unconditioned food stimulus was paired with the neutral Bell's stimulus, As an example, in Pavlov's case, the neutral stimulus ( the bell) became a conditioned stimulus.

3. In designing advertisements, advertisers can link stimuli. They try to create a certain kind of learning in which a neutral stimulus is linked to an unconditioned stimulus

الفقره رقم 2 جاب منها بس المعذره نسيت